After I’d thanked the Hertfordshire
gentleman whose thoughtful letter prompted my post of last week – and yes, it was a
real letter that came through a real letter box – he has written to me again.
And I have to share it with you. This time it concerns a Narnian fish
called a pavender, which is mentioned not only in Prince Caspian, but also in The
Silver Chair when Jill and Eustace enjoy one of the few good meals of their
adventure, a royal feast in the great hall of Cair Paravel.
The
banners hung from the roof, and each course came in with trumpeters and
kettledrums. There were soups that would make your mouth water to think of, and
the lovely fishes called pavenders, and venison and peacock and pies, and ices
and jellies and fruit and nuts, and all manner of wines and fruit drinks.
I’d sometimes idly
wondered if there really might be a fish called a pavender – after all, there
are plenty of strangely named English fishes, such as gudgeon, chub, dace,
roach, etc – or whether Lewis had simply invented it. Well, the answer is
neither, and it’s far more fun! Here is the Hertfordshire gentleman to explain it all:
"In
Prince Caspian, as you may remember,
Trumpkin catches and cooks for the Pevensies some delicious little fish called
pavenders. This, I believe, is a private scholarly joke of Lewis’s. It is a
reference to a poem published originally in Punch,
called ‘A False Gallop of Analogies’, by one Warham St Leger. The conceit of
the poem springs from a reference to ‘the chavender, or chub’ in Isaac Walton’s
The Compleat Angler. So it begins:
There is a fine stuffed chavender,
A chavender, or chub
That decks the rural pavender
The pavender, or pub,
Wherein I eat my gravender,
My gravender, or grub…
And so on, with references to ‘sweet lavender, or
lub’ and administering a snavender, or snub, to an intrusive young cavender, or
cub; and the ravender, or rub, of having to return to town. If you are
interested, you can find the whole poem in full at: http://www.poetrynook.com/poem/false-gallop-analogies."
(In fact I suggest you visit
this link without delay and read the poem in full; it will make you happy!) The Hertfordshire gentleman continues:
"I am only aware of the poem through encountering it
in the Festival of Britain issue of Punch, which I was given by my father at
the time. As well as topical items … it contained an anthology of notable
cartoons and other snippets, from issues over the past century. Lewis would no
doubt relish the reference to the ‘pavender, or pub’ and have stored it away
for future use"
I don’t need to
tell you how delighted I am to have learned the origin of this obscure Narnian
fish (or dish) and (in the words of the other Lewis, Lewis Carroll) to have un-dish-covered the fish and
dish-covered the riddle.
Find my book, "From Spare Oom to War Drobe: Travels in Narnia with my nine year-old self" at Hive.co.uk, at Amazon.co.uk, and at all good bookshops.
About a month ago I was asked
by the website Female First to write a short piece about families in Narnia,
and I came to the conclusion that happy families are not easy to find there. You
can read what I wrote here, but to summarise: the
Pevensies’ parents are remarkable mainly for their absence; we never even set
eyes on them until Lucy sees them waving from a distant “English” spur of
Aslan’s holy mountain, by which time they are all of them dead. Eustace
Scrubb’s parents send him to boarding school at the ominously named Experiment House, where he is bullied and made miserable. So do Jill’s. All we learn of Polly’s parents is that her
mother sends her to bed for coming home late. Digory's father is far away in India, so he and his dying mother are forced to live with kindly but
ineffectual Aunt Letty, and dangerously ‘mad’ Uncle Andrew.
So much for the children from
our world. What about those born in Narnia itself? Shasta (aka Prince Cor of Archenland) is stolen at
birth and raised by an abusive foster-father who tries to sell him into
slavery. Aravis escapes from a father who is pressuring her into a detestable
marriage. Prince Caspian’s father has been murdered by his usurping uncle, King Miraz, so that when his aunt, Queen Prunaprismia, gives Miraz an heir,
Caspian’s own life is in immediate danger. Whether true fathers or surrogates, father-figures in the Narnia books tend either to be absent, or else very much part of the problem.
Orphaned children, or children
with absent or neglectful parents are of course a recurrent theme in children’s
fiction and in fairytales. Without adults to help them, such children have to solve
their own problems: in narrative terms it gives them agency and
establishes an immediate bond of sympathy between reader and character. Think of
Hansel and Gretel, Cinderella, Snow-White, Heidi – or Harry Potter, Lyra and
Will, and Seren Rhys in Catherine Fisher's enchanting middle-grade book The Clockwork Crow (which I highly recommend). Orphaned or neglected children frequently appear in adult fiction too, such as Jane
Eyre, or Rudyard Kipling's Kim, or Cosette in Les Miserables, and are liberally scattered throughout the works of Dickens (David Copperfield, Little
Dorrit, Pip, Oliver Twist, Jo the crossing sweeper and so on).
But there is a poignancy about
the Narnian orphans that may ultimately derive from Lewis’s loss of his own
mother to cancer when he was nine years old. As was then common practice, she was nursed and even operated upon at home, and in his autobiography Surprised by Joy he describes how her illness affected him and his brother: ‘Our whole existence
changed into something alien and menacing, when the house became full of
strange smells and midnight noises and sinister whispered conversations’. He
tells of desperately praying God for a miracle to save his mother, and the terror of being taken into her bedroom ‘to see her’ when she had died.
Then, just a few weeks after this huge loss,
his grieving father, probably with no idea what better to do with his small son,
sent him to the English boarding school his brother already attended, an establishment which unfortunately was run by a sadistic headmaster who might have come straight out of Dickens.
No one can mistake the emotion with which Lewis paints himself and his fellow
pupils as ‘pale, quivering, tear-stained, obsequious slaves’. No wonder he
never had a good word to say about schools in the Narnia series. He couldn't tell his father, partly because children often don't know how, but also because their relationship had suffered and, as he himself acknowledged, never really recovered, even after he was allowed to leave school to study with a tutor who recognised and encouraged his potential. Perhaps it's significant that (Aslan aside), Prince Caspian's tutor Dr Cornelius is the one Narnian father-figure whom Lewis depicts as entirely laudable.
Surprised By Joy was published in 1955, the same year as The Magician’s Nephew - the book in which he relives, re-writes, re-imagines the events of his mother's death and
gives them the miraculously happy ending he’d longed for as a child. It's clear that the painful series of events surrounding his mother's death remained vivid in Lewis’s memory.
For there are many other boys in the Narnia stories whose
mothers have died. Shasta is separated from his mother when he is kidnapped as a baby, but she then dies long before he can be reunited with her. And there is no particular
narrative reason why this should be so. It just is– perhaps Lewis couldn't visualise such a reunion. Caspian’s parents are both already dead when we first meet him as a little boy: his father murdered by Miraz and his mother (perhaps) dying naturally, and earlier. Youthful Prince Rilian of The Silver
Chair loses his mother – Ramandu’s daughter and Caspian’s Queen –when she
is stung to death by a poisonous green serpent. This serpent is the Green Witch, who
compounds her wickedness by enchanting and imprisoning Rilian: he loses
ten years of his life with her and is reunited with his father Caspian only on the old king's deathbed.
Much of this post has been inspired by a letter I recently received from a gentleman in Hertfordshire who has pointed out something I hadn't noticed, near the end of The
Last Battle. It comes after Peter has shut and locked the Stable Door and ‘Narnia is no more’. Lucy
is in tears, but Peter chides her: ‘What, Lucy! You’re not crying? With Aslan
ahead, and all of us here?’ Tirian replies for her: ‘Sirs, the Ladies do well to weep. See, I do so myself, I have seen my
mother’s death. ...It were no virtue, but great discourtesy, if we did not mourn.’
My correspondent goes on to say:
‘I have seen my mother’s death.’
Narnia began with Digory seeking something to prevent his mother’s death. The
tree grown from the Narnian apple that does so provides wood for the wardrobe
that is the first way into Narnia. The death of Rilian’s mother is the spring
for the story of The Silver Chair,
and now Narnia is mourned by Tirian as his dead mother. The cycle is complete.
One might say that all his life Lewis was looking for his mother, though I
don’t place too much stress on that. But certainly, to me Narnia has the air of
a land of lost content.
So it is that Narnia, the beloved land that
has nurtured him, is mourned by Tirian as deeply as if she were his dead mother. I find this and its implications very touching. One of the lovely things since the publication of Spare Oom at the beginning of May has been the conversations it’s provoked, both on and off
line. There is always something more to say about Narnia.
You can find my book, "From Spare Oom to War Drobe: Travels in Narnia with my nine year-old self" at Hive.co.uk, at Amazon.co.uk, and from all good bookshops.
All the illustrations in this post are of course by the wondeful Pauline Baynes.
Aged nine and passionate about Narnia, I wrote a set of my own stories about that magical country, a far-off labour of love which resulted in the publication this year (2021) of my book about Narnia: 'From Spare Oom to War Drobe'. So great is the power of childhood reading to reverberate down the years! Now my
friend and fellow author Elizabeth Kay has sent me a poem she wrote about
her own experience of reading the Chronicles of Narnia when she was a child of ten. It’s
so lovely I’ve asked her to let me share it with you: and this is her introduction.
For me, aged ten, the
Chronicles of Narnia produced one of those lightbulb moments. I can remember
sitting up in bed and thinking, ‘hang on – died and came back to life three days
later? Where have I heard that before?’ It was my discovery of subtext, and the
moment I made the connection, decoding the rest of the books became an
obsession.
Vera Rich, poetry translator extraordinaire who died ten
years ago, knew all sorts of people and told me that Tolkien had tackled Lewis
as to why everyone in Narnia spoke English. The
Magician’s Nephew was written retrospectively to explain this, as well as
being a convenient parallel for Genesis.
My French teacher at school, a Dr Moore, lived with her
elderly father who had been an Oxford don and a friend of all the Inklings. How
I wish I’d asked a few more questions! But those books left such a lasting
impression that when I wrote my own fantasy, The Divide, I wanted to recapture some of that feeling of exploring
another world peopled with all the mythical beings of my childhood. It also led
to my poem The Threshold, which was, incidentally, published by Vera Rich in
her magazine Manifold.
At the end of this month my book about Narnia will be
published – 'From Spare Oom to War Drobe', Darton Longman and Todd, 29th April 2021,
£16.99: https://bit.ly/3wHaOYw– and available from all good book retailers. The map on the cover is one I copied as a child from Pauline Baynes' map of Narnia in Prince Caspian. I apologise for blowing my own trumpet! But this book had its genesis both here on
my blog and more importantly, in the absolute and utter love I had for the
Seven Chronicles when I was a child. I read and re-read them until the covers
were dog-eared and creased and coming to pieces. I almost – almost! – believed Narnia to be real, and I desperately wanted to read more stories about that magical land.
Do you remember this passage from The Last Battle? It comes near the end, when Tirian, Jill and
Eustace, with Puzzle the donkey and Jewel the Unicorn, are walking through the
springtime woods hoping (it is a forlorn hope) to meet Roonwit the Centaur leading reinforcements from Cair Paravel to
defeat the forces of evil. While they walk, Jewelbegins telling Jill about the long and mostly peaceful
history of Narnia:
He spoke of Swanwhite the Queen who
had lived before the days of the White Witch and the Great Winter, who was so
beautiful that when she looked into any forest pool the reflection of her face
shone out of the water like a star by night for a year and a day afterwards.
Isn’t that lovely? Elvish enough for Tinúviel.
He spoke of Moonwood the Hare who had
such ears that he could sit under Cauldron Pool under the thunder of the great
waterfall and hear what men spoke in whispers at Cair Paravel. He told how King
Gale, who was ninth in descent from Frank the first of all Kings, had sailed
far away into the Eastern seas and delivered the Lone Islands from a dragon,
and how, in return, they had given him the Lone Islands to be part of the royal
lands of Narnia for ever.… And as he
went on, the picture of all those happy years, all the thousands of them, piled
up in Jill’s mind till it was rather like looking down from a high hill on to a
rich, lovely plain full of woods and waters and cornfields…
I wanted very badly to know these stories in full. So I tried
to write some of them myself, and this was the result: my very own 'Tales of Narnia'!
I was wise enough not to attempt a story about Swanwhite, whose
whiteness by the way – the warm whiteness of a swan’s feathers – is
wonderfully different from the stark whiteness of the witch Jadis whose skin is
variously described as white as salt (strong and bitter), white as paper
(blank) or white as icing sugar (chokingly sweet).
No, I plumped for King Gale and his dragon. In my story a Talking
Stag brings King Gale and his Best Flying Horse Friend, Diamond, terrible news
of a dragon attack on the Lone Islands. Leaping into action, Gale and Diamond
fly to Cair Paravel where a ship is waiting, and are soon at sea with exciting adventures along the way – like this one:
Suddenly, from the fighting top, the
lookout shouted, “Land Ho!” “That’ll be Galma and Terebinthia, won’t it?” the
King remarked to Drinian. “Yes Sire,” said Drinian. “And I think –” the King
never knew what Drinian thought, because just at that minute, he was
interrupted by the lookout yelling “Pirate ship on the starboard side, bearing
up on us fast.” “Hm. Terebinthian by her rig,” muttered the King. He was roused
by Drinian shouting orders. “All hands on deck, man the guns, look
lively!”At once all the crew came
rushing to man and prime the guns… Meanwhile, the pirate was bearing down on
them fast. Drinian waited till it was within range, then “Fire!!!” rang out
across the ship. When the smoke cleared they could see that she (the pirate)
was holed and slowly sinking. “Shall I fire again, Sire?” asked Drinian.
“Aslan’s Mane! No! Aslan forbid that I should ever fire upon a sinking ship!”
cried the King. “Your Majesty is the mirror of honour,” replied Drinian
gravely. … Slowly she sank, until only a whirling, troubled patch of water
showed where she had been.
I’m amused by the stiff Narnian dialogue, also that I felt it
necessary to explain in brackets that ‘she’ was the ship; and I bet you never
knew that Narnian ships carried cannons, let alone such effective ones. And it
now seems to me rather a pity that in spite of his vaunted chivalry, Gale makes no
attempt to rescue any of the drowning pirates. But in my view back then,
baddies were baddies and deserved what they got.
I loved writing these stories, and they taught me at least two
important things. First, I found out that I couldn’t write as well as C. S.
Lewis. 😕 Second, I found that writing’s a very different
pleasure from reading: you don't experience the story, live in it, in quite the same way. I didn't want to stop, though. I went on to write stories about
the Seven Brothers of Shuddering Wood and the Lapsed Bear of Stormness and other marginal Narnian characters. My poem about The Beginning of Narnia (no less!) with its awkward rhymes and solemn footnote will probably make you both wince and smile; it does me, but oh, it was heartfelt!
None of these tales of mine really succeeded in satisfying my longing for Narnia. Yet in the process of writing ‘Spare Oom’ over a year ago, I did feel I had
at last got back there – in revisiting, reliving my childhood passion for the stories, and
exploring with delight the many vivid threads Lewis has woven into the tapestry of
his world with references not only to Christianity and the Bible, but to medieval
and Renaissance poetry, fairy tales, Shakespeare, Plato and Socratic logic, Lewis
Carroll, George MacDonald, Edith Nesbit… he poured into them everything that he
loved. Like Lewis himself, the books have their faults, but they still offer
a great richness of experience to any child who reads them. I count myself
lucky to have been one.
In a free online event on
Friday 7th May I will be discussing the book and the world of Narnia
with the novelist and critic Amanda Craig.
What – if
anything – happens after death? A fantasy world, no matter how beautifully
constructed, lacks something if there’s no thought given to what happens when
characters die, or at least to what beliefs they hold about what may happen. We
live not only in the physical universe but in our mental construction of it.
Death is a huge subject for humanity, and so not unnaturally Life and Death are
recurrent themes in some of the fantasies I love best – The Lord of the Rings, the Narnia stories, Ursula K Le Guin’s
Earthsea books, Philip Pullman’s His Dark
Materials, and the Old Kingdom novels of Garth Nix.
To begin
with Tolkien: though mortal, Hobbits don’t seem to have a theory of the
afterlife. Innocent, rural, physical, they thoroughly enjoy this life’s
pleasures and die with a sense of fulfilment: a long life well lived. Can Bilbo
outlive the Old Took? He will if he can. We are told nothing of Hobbit funerals
except at the very end of The Return of
the King where the hobbits who fell at the Battle of Bywater are laid
together ‘in a grave on the hillside, where later a great stone was set up with
a garden around it.’ Their names live on in memory, but there’s no speculation
about a hobbit heaven, just a practical disposal of the mortal remains – and an
equally practical interest in inheritance.
Dwarves are
mortal too. From the evidence of Balin’s tomb in Moria they build, as you’d
expect, good solid stone monuments to commorate their dead. Again there’s
little evidence of a dwarfish belief in an afterlife, but a mystical streak is
apparent in Gimli’s hints about their creator-ancestor Durin, a hero-king
asleep under the stone, who will one day awake – and who, according to Appendix
A, is occasionally reincarnated in a child of his line.Then there are the Ents. Though some, like
Treebeard, are immensely ancient, Ents are probably not immortal. Since they
have lost the Entwives there can be no more Entlings and their race will
dwindle. Some Ents become more and more like trees, and even the oldest tree
eventually dies, though a truly tree-ish Ent may hardly notice. The Elves are
immortal unless killed in battle, or unless like Lùthien and Arwen they choose
mortality – but the trees of Lothlorien are in eternal autumn, their springtime
long passed, and more and more of the Fair Folk are heading for the Grey
Havens.
The point
about Mortal Men in Middle-earth is
that they are mortal. The Riders of Rohan view death as a feasting-hall of the
brave, like the Norse Valhalla; their poetry is full of Anglo-Saxon melancholy,
laden as Legolas says, ‘with the sadness of Mortal Men’:
‘Where now the horse and the rider? Where is the horn that
was blowing?Where is the helm and the
hauberk and the bright hair flowing? Where is the hand on the harpstring and
the red fire glowing?’
When the Men
of Gondor die, or at least their kings and stewards, they are laid to rest in
tombs of stone in Rath DÃnen, the Silent Street under Mount Mindolluin. It
appears from Denethor’s words that they think of death as a long solitary sleep
rather than ancestral companionship in an eternal feasting hall – but this may
not always have been so:
‘No tomb for Denethor and Faramir!No tomb!No long slow sleep of death embalmed.We will burn like heathen kings before ever a ship sailed hither from
the West…’
One way or
another, Mortal Men must accept death. Clinging on to this world may lead to
the worst possible thing that can happen: they may become wraiths like the
Barrow-wights on the Barrow-Downs, or like the Ringwraiths.
Finally, for
the Ring-bearers Frodo and Bilbo (and possibly later for Sam) there’s the unusual
opportunity to go bodily into the West on an Elven ship. Unlike the film, in
which Gandalf comforts Pippin with a description of Eressëa or possibly Valinor, the book makes
clear that this is a special privilege. As Frodo’s ship passes into the West,
… it seemed to him that as in his dream in the house of
Bombadil, the grey rain-curtain turned all to silver glass and was rolled back,
and he beheld white shores and beyond them a far green country under a swift
sunrise.
But to Sam the evening deepened into darkness as he stood at
the Haven, and as he looked at the grey sea he saw only a shadow on the waters
that was soon lost in the West.
A deep vein
of nostalgic sadness runs through the heart of The Lord of the Rings. Except for Men, all of the different races
are doomed either to fade or pass from Middle-earth. And in the process of his
journey, Frodo leaves behind not only the comfortable rural beauty of the
Shire, but the very person he was. Suffering, and his immense struggle with the
Ring change him into someone different – nobler, wiser maybe, but maimed,
changed, sadder. We can only hope that the West will heal him. We will never
know.
The Narnia
books contain little of this nostalgia. C.S. Lewis is very clear about life
after death: it’s Aslan’s country, and several of his characters actually go
there in life – Jill and Eustace start out for Narnia from Aslan’s holy Eastern
mountain, for example, and the heroic Reepicheep sails there in his coracle.
Remarkably,
through the first six books of the Chronicles
this certainty does not negate the sorrow of mortality.Death, when it occurs, is given emotional
weight. Aslan’s death in The Lion, The
Witch and The Wardrobe is genuinely moving, partly because of the depth of
grief of Lucy and Susan, and so is Caspian’s death in The Silver Chair, witnessed from a distance by Jill and Eustace.
The very old King lifts his hand to bless his long-lost son, then falls back –
The Prince, kneeling by the the King’s bed, laid down his
head upon it, and wept. There were whisperings and goings to and fro. Then Jill
noticed that all who wore hats, bonnets, helmets or hoods were taking them off
– Eustace included. Then she heard a rustling and flapping noise up above the
castle; when she looked up she saw that the great banner with the golden Lion
on it was being brought down to half-mast. And after that, slowly, mercilessly,
with wailing strings and disconsolate blowings of horns, the music began again:
this time, a tune to break your heart.
Aslan blows
all these things away ‘like wreaths of smoke’ and the children find themselves
once more in Aslan’s country ‘among mighty trees and beside a fair, fresh
stream’. But the funeral music continues.
And there, on the golden gravel of the bed of the stream lay
King Caspian, dead, with the water flowing over him like liquid glass. His long
beard swayed in it like water weed. And all three stood and wept.
Their tears
are shed, it seems to me, as much for age and feebleness and the sorrows of
life, as they are for the fact of death. The deliberate parallel is with the
New Testament story of Jesus weeping over Lazarus’s tomb: even though he knows he is about to bring Lazarus back to life. So
too here. Caspian’s death is about to be reversed by a drop of Aslan’s blood.
For me, this works. It’s not a facile trick. To obtain the blood, Eustace must
drive a thorn ‘a foot long and as sharp as a rapier’ into the great pad of
Aslan’s paw: we feel the cost and the pain. But at the end of The Last Battle, where Narnia itself is
replaced by what we are meant to believe is agreater and better Kingdom, Lewis’s attempt is an artistic failure. The
Christian agenda takes over; he tries to do too much: heaven isn’t Aslan’s holy
mountain any more, it’s Narnia and Archenland and Calormen and England
combined. It’s messy. I far prefer that numinous glimpse of mountains behind
the rising sun at the eastern rim of the world, in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader.
Heaven, a
place of reward for a good life or of union with a good God, is not quite the
same thing as the ‘land of the dead’ – that twilight place where ever since
classical times the shades of the departed have swarmed in voiceless,
strengthess hordes, unable to speak unless given a drink of sacrificial blood.
(The notion that a blood sacrifice gives life to the dead must be one of the
most ancient of beliefs.) Visiting Persephone’s kingdom beyond the Stream of
Ocean, Odysseus attempts to embrace his mother’s shade, but she flutters out of
his arms like a shadow and ‘sorrow sharpened at the heart within me’. This is what
happens to everyone, his mother tells him, for once
‘the sinews no longer hold the flesh and the bones together,
and once the spirit has left the white bones, all the rest
of the body is made subject to the fire’s strong fury,
but the soul flitters out like a dream and flies away.’
The Odyssey, XI, 219-223, tr. Richmond Lattimore
Famous too
is the rebuke of the dead hero Achilles when Odysseus tries to console him by
telling him of the fame he has won among the living.
‘O shining Odysseus, never try to console me for dying.
I would rather follow the plough as thrall to another
man, one with no land allotted to him and not much to live on
than be a king of all the perished dead.’
The Odyssey, XI, 488-491, tr. Richmond Lattimore
Odysseus in the Underworld, Johannes Stradanus
This type of
afterlife, a shadow-life devoid of human meaning, is found in Ursula K Le
Guin’s Earthsea books. In A Wizard of
Earthsea the young wizard Ged splits open the fabric of his world in
arrogant anger to summon the spirit of the beautiful Elfarran, a thousand years
dead. Through the gap he has made scrambles a ‘clot of black shadow’ which
leaps at him and rips his face. It hunts him from one side of the Archipelago
to the other, and not until Ged learns to confront his own darkness can he undo
his deed.
The Earthsea
books are deeply concerned with the interdependence of light and darkness, life
and death, and in the early titles the land of the dead is conceived as a
necessary counterweight to the world of the living. It’s a place of dust,
darkness and silence, divided from life by a low wall of stones ‘no higher than
a man’s knee’. The dead are passive, passionless:
No marks of illness were on them. They were whole, and
healed. They were healed of pain, and of life. They were not loathsome as Arren
had feared they would be, not frightening… Quiet were their faces, freed from
anger and desire, and there was in their shadowed eyes no hope.
Instead of fear, then, great pity rose up in Arren, and if
fear underlay it, it was not for himself, but for us all. For he saw the mother
and child who had died together, and they were in the dark land together; but
the child did not run, nor did it cry, and the mother didnot hold it, nor even look at it. And those
who had died for love passed each other in the street.
The Farthest Shore
Terrible as
this is, it possesses a poignancy reminiscent of the Odyssey. In the three early Earthsea books you can’t have life
without death:
Only in dark the light, only in dying life:
bright the hawk’s flight on the empty sky.
The message
of The Farthest Shore is that death
is a natural and necessary end. The mage Cob is so terrified of dying that he
tries to put an end to it, ‘to find what you cowards could never find – the way
back from death.’ In doing so he threatens the balance of Earthsea and himself
becomes an eyeless, nameless sorceror who belongs to neither life nor
death.Mere continued existence, it
turns out, is a curse. ‘You cannot see the light of day, you cannot see the
dark,’ Ged tells him. ‘You sold the green earth and the sun and stars to save
yourself. But you have no self.’
In the two
later books, Tehanu and The Other Wind, Le Guin revisits
Earthsea and remakessome of what she
has done. Dragons and their relationship with humankind become important, and
the very nature of the land of death is re-examined. In The Other Wind Alder, a young sorceror whose wife has died, is
tormented by dreams in which she and others of the dead come to the wall of
stones and beg to be set free. He tells Ged,
I thought if I called her by her true name maybe I could free
her, bring her across the wall, and I said, ‘Come with me, Mevre!’But she said, ‘That’s not my name, Hara,
that’s not my name any more.’ And she let go my hands, though I tried to hold
her. She cried, ‘Set me free, Hara!’But
she was going down into the dark.
These dead
are neither passive nor passionless, and they recognise and commune with the
living man Alder. Instead of maintaining the mystical equilibrium of Earthsea,
the land of the dead is now seen to be upsetting it. Humankind and dragons were
once one race which divided the world between them. Humans chose to own and
make things; dragons chose freedom to fly ‘on the other wind’ in a timeless
realm beyond the west. However, ‘the ancient mages craved everlasting life’ and
used ‘true names to keep men from dying’. And – so the dragon Irian cries –
‘by the spells and wizardries of those oath-breakers, you
stole half our realm from us, walled it away from life and light, so that you
could live there forever.Thieves,
traitors!’
It now seems
the land of death is a dreadful compromise, an everlasting trap. It divorces
those in it from the universe, which is the only life. The solution is to pull
down the wall of stones and let the dead go free. Some rise up ‘flickering into
dragons’ on the wind, but most come ‘walking with unhurried certainty’ to step
across the ruined wall and vanish, ‘a wisp of dust, a breath that shone an
instant in the ever-brightening light.’ And where have theygone?As Alder said, ‘It is not life they yearn for. It is death. To be one
with the earth again. To rejoin it.’
It’s lovely,
but I don’t think it quite works. It’s too complicated, too different from the
earlier books. It takes a lot to undo the quietly terrible beauty of the dead
land in A Wizard of Earthsea, its
inhabitants ‘healed of life’. The dying child whom Ged fails to heal in A Wizard of Earthsea runs ‘fast and far
away from him down a dark slope, the side of some vast hill’ – and that
eagerness feels right. In these early books, the dead are shadows with no
internal life. They feel no pain because they are already gone. It seems to me a mistake to reinvent this metaphor,
and the events of The Other Wind make
nonsense of the rebuke Ged delivers to Cob in The Farthest Shore.
The impulse
to harrow hell and bring out the souls is felt also by Philip Pullman in The Amber Spyglass, the final book in
the trilogy His Dark Materials.Like Lewis, Pullman has an agenda (Darwinian
and anti-religious) and like Le Guin he turns to what one might call the Wordsworthian
‘back to nature’ view of death – the dissolution of personality and the
blending of the body and its atoms with the physical universe.
No motion has she now, no force,
She neither hears nor sees,
Rolled round in earth’s diurnal course
With rocks, and stones, and trees.
‘A Slumber Did My Spirit Seal’, William Wordsworth
The problem
is to convince the reader that this is an acceptable personal outcome. Does
that sound frivolous? My own belief, if you want it, is that Wordsworth and
Pullman and Darwin are right. I don’t think there’s a life after death. I don’t
find that scary, but neither does it give me joy. Only life can do that. In
fiction, paradoxically, it seems the best way to make the no-afterlife option appear positive is to contrast it with an afterlife, but an unpleasant one –
thus making the point via a sort of authorial sleight-of-hand. (‘You can have
an afterlife, but you won’t enjoy it.’)
Aeneas and the Sibyl in Hades
Pullman’s
land of the dead is a considerably less attractive proposition even than Le
Guin’s. It is modelled on the Hades of Virgil’s Aeneid, rather than on Homer’s Odyssey.
In the Aeneid, after sacrificing to
Night, Earth, Proserpina and Hades, Aeneas ventures underground guided by the
Sibyl. He passes gates guarded by monsters and crosses the river Styx with the
ferryman Charon, who at first refuses to carry a living man over:
‘… This
is a realm of shadows, sleep and drowsy night.
The law forbids me to carry living bodies across
in my Stygian boat…’
The Aeneid, tr. Robert Fagles
In The Amber Spyglass, there are perhaps
rather too many stages to death.Lyra
and her friends begin their exodus from life via a farmhouse kitchen of the
recently slain, following their shocked ghosts into a grey and ever-darkening
landscape, ‘thousands of men and women and children … drifting over the plain’,
drawn onwards and down to shantytown suburbs of death on the shores of a
mist-bound lake. In my opinion the refugee metaphor gets away from Pullman and
over-complicates the narrative. Living officials – I’m not sure why they’re alive – demand to see
papers, and direct the travellers to ‘holding areas’ past ‘pools of sewage’.
Taking shelter in a shanty, Lyra learns that each ghost must wait until his or
her personified ‘death’ gives them leave to cross over the lake, so Lyra must
call up her own death before she can continue.She does, but there is a further complexity. Returning to the classical
norm, the ferryman refuses to carry Lyra across the lake unless she leaves
behind her beloved daemon, spirit-self and other half, Pan:
‘It’s not a rule you can break. It’s a law like this one…’
[The ferryman] leaned over the side and cupped a handful of water, and then
tilted his hand so it ran out again. ‘The law that makes the water run back
into the lake, it’s a law like that.’
The Amber Spyglass
After this
anguished parting Lyra, Will and the dragonfly-borne Gallivespians cross the
river to land at a wharf and rampart. They pass through a great gate guarded by
screaming harpies and find beyond it a vast and dismal plain crowded with
listless, voiceless ghosts who, as ever, require blood.
They crammed forward, light and lifeless, to warm themselves
at the flowing blood and the strong-beating hearts of the two travellers…
Once they
can communicate, Lyra asks to be led to her friend Roger (for whose death she
feels responsible), but when she finds him ‘he passe[s] like cold smoke through
her arms’.Determining to release all
the dead from this Hades, Lyra consults the alethiometer and explains to the
ghosts what will happen to them:
‘… it’s true, perfectly true. When you go out of here, all
the particles that make you up will loosen and float apart, just like your
daemons did. … But your daemons en’t just nothing now; they’re part of
everything. … You’ll drift apart, it’s true, but you’ll be out in the open,
part of everything alive again.’
‘It’s true,
perfectly true’. Here Pullman himself speaks through Lyra, pleading and
passionate, promising no lies, no deceit. The science-based truth of this
account of death is indisputable. The body does indeed return to the earth that
gave it. The difficulty is that these ghosts’ bodies must – most of them –
already have disintegrated, yet here their spirits inhabit an afterlife in
which personality and personal memories survive
as some form of post-mortem energy. Accepting Lyra’s offer, one of the
ghosts says,
‘… the land of the dead isn’t a place of reward or a place of
punishment. It’s a place of nothing...’
But is this
true?Compared with Le Guin’s dark,
neutral world under the unchanging stars, Pullman’s land of the dead is a place of punishment. As Roger’s
ghost tells Lyra:
Them bird-things… You know what they do? They wait till
you’re resting – you can’t never sleep properly, you just sort of doze – and
they come up quiet beside you and they whisper all the bad things you ever did
when you was alive … They know how to make you feel horrible … But you can’t
get away from them.
The harpies
have been set by the Authority ‘to see the worst in everyone’ and to feed on
them. Lyra and her companions come up with a solution. From now on, instead of
lies, each person who dies must nourish the harpies with a truthful account of
all the things they’ve seen and heard, touched and learned. Experience of life,
in other words, trumps death. I like this, a lot: and Roger’s final release
into the physical universe, with a laugh of surprise and a ‘vivid little burst
of happiness’ is moving. Nevertheless the effect of this joyful annihilation
very much depends on Pullman’s depiction of the afterlife as a distinctly worse
option.
Garth Nix,
in his series of ‘Old Kingdom’ novels beginning with Sabriel, has so far as I can tell no particular religious or
scientific points to make, and his fantasy has a corresponding air of freshness
and freedom – even playfulness – all of its own. Life and Death are of
paramount interest, since the Old Kingdom is a magical land under continuous
threat of necromancy. It is divided by a Wall (perhaps suggested by Le Guin’s,
though this is not a Life/Death boundary) from the non-magical southern land of
Ancelstierre.I don’t know what happens to Ancelstierrans
when they die, but those who die in the Old Kingdom cross an unseen border into
the state of Death itself, a coldly flowing river without banks which sweeps
them away through a series of nine Gates.In the stretches of river between these Gates – the Precincts – it’s
possible for some Dead to cling on or even retrace their steps:
It had been human once, or human-like at least, in the years
it had lived under the sun. That humanity had been lost in the centuries the
thing spent in the chill waters of Death, ferociously holding its own against
the current, demonstrating an incredible will to live again. ... Its chance
finally came when a mighty spirit erupted from beyond the Seventh Gate,
smashing through each of the Upper Gates in turn, till it went ravening into
Life. Hundreds of the Dead had followed and this particular spirit… had managed
to squirm triumphantly into Life.
Sabriel
The Lesser
Dead, such as this one, need to take over human or animal bodies for their use.
The Greater Dead who come from beyond the Fifth Gate are sufficiently powerful
to exist in Life without a physical body. (A further danger are Free Magic
Creatures, perilous elemental beings outside the ordered power of the Charter,
but these are not the Dead.)
The
returning Dead are uniformly malevolent, and it’s the job of the Abhorson –
Sabriel herself – to return them to Death and send them down the River and past
the Ninth Gate.This she does by means
of a set of seven enspelled bells, infused with beneficent Charter Magic
created – or perhaps discovered or formalised? – long ago by the immortal Seven
Bright Shiners, each one of which is represented by a named bell.
The idea of
a River of Death is hardly a new one; it goes back to ferryman Charon rowing
souls across the Styx, and further still to the boatman Ur-shanabi in the Epic of Gilgamesh – but what Garth Nix
has done with it is different: instead of a boundary which must be crossed, his
River of Death is a dynamic process – a progression, a vivid natural force
which grasps the dying soul and sweeps it away. As such there is a ‘rightness’
about consenting to its power and a corresponding ‘wrongness’ when the dead
struggle literally to swim against the stream. More than that, as a metaphor
for death a river is nothing like the static, dusty dead lands which so trouble
Ursula K Le Guin and Philip Pullman. A river is about motion, exhilaration and
strength. A river has a direction and a purpose.
Not until
the third book in the series, Abhorson,
do we really learn the geography of Death as Nix takes the reader all the way
down the River through every Gate with Lirael, the Abhorson-in-Waiting, along
with her inseparable companion the Disreputable Dog.Each Gate has its own character, each
Precinct its own perils, not only sneaking souls and monstrous foes but the
River itself:
The Second Gate was an enormous hole, into which the river
sank like sinkwater down a drain, creating a whirlpool of terrible strength.
Abhorson
While beyond
it in the Third Precinct –
The river there was only ankle deep, and little warmer. The
light was better too. Brighter and less fuzzy, though still a pallid grey. Even
the current wasn’t much more than a trickle around the ankles. All in all, it
was a much more attractive place than the First or Second Precincts. Somewhere
ill-trained or foolish necromancers might be tempted to tarry or rest.
If they did, it wouldn’t be for long – because the Third
Precinct had waves…
Lirael and
the Dog battle through mists, waterfalls, metamorphic waters, a ‘waterclimb’,
floating flames – and finally the Ninth Gate, where the River finally does what
rivers always do. It flows out into something greater than itself, ‘a great
flat stretch of sparkling water’ – along with the souls it carries. Overhead is
an immense sky ‘so thick with stars that they overlapped and merged to form one
unimaginably vast and luminous cloud.’
Lirael felt the stars call to her and a yearning rose in her
heart to answer. She sheathed bell and sword and stretched her arms out, up to
the brilliant sky. She felt herself lifted up, and her feet came out of the
river with a soft ripple and a sigh from the waters.
Dead rose too, she saw. Dead of all shapes and sizes, all
rising up to the sea of stars.
This at last
is the ‘final death from which there could be no return.’
For me, this
is inexpressibly moving. There’s no judgement. Whatever has happened before,
whatever the dead may have done during Life and after it, from this perspective
looks insignificant. The journey through Death may be full of terrors; a spirit
may go kicking and screaming all the way down the River, struggling to turn
around and go back to Life. But once beyond the Ninth Gate the sight of the
stars is revelatory and transformative. Letting go of Life at last, the dead
fall serenely upwards into a tranquil universe.
All the
classic fantasies I’ve looked at in this essay engage with the fact of death
and what happens after, and all attempt answers. Tolkien and Lewis were both
Christians, but their answers are very different. Tolkien’s Mortal Men have no
assurance of an afterlife, for the immortality of Middle-earth is in the Undying Lands,
and passage there is in the gift of the Elves.Gondor’s dead pass to an eternal sleep; the Rohirrim feast with their
ancestors. For Narnians, there’s the happy certainty of Aslan’s country, a
place which Lewis wishes to assure us is not less but more real than life: the Platonic solid of which the mortal Narnia
is but a shadow.In Ursula K Le Guin’s
early Earthsea books, the land of the dead is the darkness which is the other
half of light: you can’t have one without the other. She rethought that in the
last book, turning the duality into a unity from which the spirits of the dead
evanesce into light. No more darkness.For Philip Pullman, passionately concerned to do away with what he
considers to be the lies of heaven and hell, Lyra’s journey through the land of
the dead becomes a sort of allegorical exposition in which the afterlife is
shown to be a cruel and hollow sham and the truth of dissolution is the best
happiness. And in Garth Nix’s metaphor of the river – with all its adventures,
snags, gates, rapids and waterfalls – death is a natural force, to resist which
is to become unnatural. In the end,
the river will always win and sweep us on into vastness.
My final
thought: we cannot think about death without making pictures.
Picture credits:
Digory and the Tree of Life, from 'The Magician's Nephew', Pauline Baynes
Night Falls on Narnia, from 'The Last Battle', Pauline Baynes
Odysseus in the Underworld, by Johannes Stradanus, 1523-1605